According to the website devoted to the Sackett
Symposium, Dr. Sackett was best known for work in three areas: research methods
for applied testing of healthcare innovations; use of those methods to evaluate
the scientific validity and clinical utility of medical interventions; and
education of healthcare clinicians in the use and application of best evidence
in practice.
The work at our college has been transformed by his
work. We use his approach in what we do- we ask questions, acquire information,
appraise that information, apply it, and assess it to determine whether it is
working. That cycle repeats itself as time goes on and as our patient either
does or does not respond to what we do. What he did, more than anyone before or
after, was show how to use research literature and combine it with clinical
expertise to benefit the patient, always respecting the patient’s own values.
We say this as a mantra now, but it was a seismic shift in how medicine was
practiced.
And he acknowledged the evidence-based medicine was
not static; it needed to evolve, and it has. He was funny, bold, and at times
profane, not afraid to use a select swear word where it was appropriate to make
his point. The Users’ Guide to the Medical Literature is based on the series of
papers Sackett and others wrote in the 1980s; that book is now in its 3rd
edition, and it helps inform Dr. Mike Haneline’s excellent text “Evidence-Based
Chiropractic Practice.”
And he was much of the opinion that once you become
seen as an expert, you need to stop and do something else. He did, regularly;
He shifted from epidemiology, to compliance and then to writing about clinical
trials. Once he became good at something, he stopped and moved to a new area.
We owe him a huge debt, which we repay every day
when we use the tools he brought to our attention. He will be missed.
No comments:
Post a Comment