Muller A. Teaching
lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender health in a South African health sciences
faculty: addressing the gap. BMC Medical Education 2013, 13:174 doi:10.1186/1472-6920-13-174
Background:
People who
identity as lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) have specific health
needs. Sexual orientation and gender identity are social determinants of
health, as homophobia and heteronormativity persist as prejudices in society.
LGBT patients often experience discrimination and prejudice in health care
settings. While recent South African policies recognise the need for providing
LGBT specific health care, no curricula for teaching about LGBT health related
issues exist in South African health sciences faculties. This study aimed to
determine the extent to which LGBT health related content is taught in the
University of Cape Town’s medical curriculum.
Methods: A curriculum
mapping exercise was conducted through an online survey of all academic staff
at the UCT health sciences faculty, determining LGBT health related content,
pedagogical methodology and assessment.
Results: 127
academics, across 31 divisions and research units in the Faculty of Health
Sciences, responded to the survey, of which 93 completed the questionnaire. Ten
taught some content related to LGBT health in the MBChB curriculum. No LGBT
health related content was taught in the allied health sciences curricula. The
MBChB curriculum provided no opportunity for students to challenge their own
attitudes towards LGBT patients, and key LGBT health topics such as safer sex,
mental health, substance abuse and adolescent health were not addressed.
Conclusion:
At present,
UCTs health sciences curricula do not adequately address LGBT specific health
issues. Where LGBT health related content is taught in the MBChB curriculum, it
is largely discretionary, unsystematic and not incorporated into the
overarching structure. Coordinated initiatives to integrate LGBT health related
content into all health sciences curricula should be supported, and follow an
approach that challenges students to develop professional attitudes and
behaviour concerning care for patients from LGBT backgrounds, as well as
providing them with specific LGBT health knowledge. Educating health
professions students on the health needs of LGBT people is essential to
improving this population’s health by providing competent and non-judgmental
care.
Weijer C, Peterson A,
Webster F, Graham M, Cruse D, Fernández-Espejo D, Gofton T, Gonzalez-Lara L, Lazosky A, Naci
L, Norton L, Spoeechley K, Young B, Owen A. Ethics of neuroimaging after
serious brain injury BMC Medical Ethics 2014, 15:41 doi:10.1186/1472-6939-15-41
ABSTRACTBackground: Patient outcome after serious brain injury is highly variable. Following a period of coma, some patients recover while others progress into a vegetative state (unresponsive wakefulness syndrome) or minimally conscious state. In both cases, assessment is difficult and misdiagnosis may be as high as 43%. Recent advances in neuroimaging suggest a solution. Both functional magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalography have been used to detect residual cognitive function in vegetative and minimally conscious patients. Neuroimaging may improve diagnosis and prognostication. These techniques are beginning to be applied to comatose patients soon after injury. Evidence of preserved cognitive function may predict recovery, and this information would help families and health providers. Complex ethical issues arise due to the vulnerability of patients and families, difficulties interpreting negative results, restriction of communication to “yes” or “no” answers, and cost. We seek to investigate ethical issues in the use of neuroimaging in behaviorally nonresponsive patients who have suffered serious brain injury. The objectives of this research are to: (1) create an approach to capacity assessment using neuroimaging; (2) develop an ethics of welfare framework to guide considerations of quality of life; (3) explore the impact of neuroimaging on families; and, (4) analyze the ethics of the use of neuroimaging in comatose patients.
Methods/Design:
Our research
program encompasses four projects and uses a mixed methods approach. Project 1
asks whether decision making capacity can be assessed in behaviorally
nonresponsive patients. We will specify cognitive functions required for
capacity and detail their assessment. Further, we will develop and pilot a
series of scenarios and questions suitable for assessing capacity. Project 2
examines the ethics of welfare as a guide for neuroimaging. It grounds an
obligation to explore patients’ interests, and we explore conceptual issues in
the development of a quality of life instrument adapted for neuroimaging.
Project 3 will use grounded theory interviews to document families’
understanding of the patient’s condition, expectations of neuroimaging, and the
impact of the results of neuroimaging. Project 4 will provide an ethical analysis
of neuroimaging to investigate residual cognitive function in comatose patients
within days of serious brain injury.
Henschke N, Harrison
C, McKay D, Broderick C, Latimer J, Britt H, Maher C. Musculoskeletal
conditions in children and adolescents managed in Australian primary care. BMC
Musculoskeletal Disorders 2014, 15:164
doi:10.1186/1471-2474-15-164
ABSTRACT
Background:
Primary care
settings play a vital role in the early detection and appropriate management of
musculoskeletal conditions in paediatric populations. However, little data
exist regarding these conditions in a primary care context or on the
presentation of specific musculoskeletal disorders in children. The aim of this
study was to estimate the caseload and describe typical management of
musculoskeletal conditions in children and adolescents presenting to primary
care in Australia.
Methods: An analysis
of data from the Bettering the Evaluation and Care of Health (BEACH) study was
performed. The BEACH study is a continuous national study of general practice
(GP) activity in Australia. We identified all GP encounters with children and
adolescents over the past five years and extracted data on demographic details,
the problems managed, and GP management of each problem. SAS statistical
software was used to calculate robust proportions and after adjustment for the
cluster, the 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results: From the
period April 2006 to March 2011, there were 65,279 encounters with children and
adolescents in the BEACH database. Of the 77,830 problems managed at these
encounters, 4.9% (95%CI 4.7% to 5.1%) were musculoskeletal problems. The rate
of musculoskeletal problems managed increased significantly with age, however
there was a significant decrease for girls aged 15–17 years. Upper and lower
limb conditions were the most common, followed by spine and trunk conditions.
Spine and trunk conditions were significantly more likely to be managed with
medication, but less likely to receive imaging, than upper or lower limb
problems.
Conclusions:
Musculoskeletal
problems in children and adolescents present a significant burden and an
important challenge to the primary health care system in Australia. There is
variability in rates of presentation between different age groups, gender and
affected body region.
No comments:
Post a Comment