In general, there are two different methods you can use when preparing references for a paper you may be writing. Generically, these are known as the name-date system and citation-sequence system. The former is demonstrated by APA and the latter by Vancouver style referencing. Which one you use depends on the journal to which you plan to submit.
In name-date system, you cite a reference in text, by including author name and publication date in parentheses. You then put that reference at the end of the paper, in the reference list, and in alphabetical order. An example would be something like this: “In the seminal work by Andrews (Andrews, 1998)...” the chief benefit to this system is the ease of update and correction- if you need to add a reference, it can easily be done and the same holds true if you need to delete a reference. But the main disadvantage here is that it ends up with strings of words interrupting the text that the reader is looking at, which can be frustrating to read. This is often referred to as APA style, based on the American Psychological Association; it may also be referred to as Oxford style.
In a citation-sequence system, which is more common in biomedical publication, the citation is made by number in the test, in the order of occurrence. The reference list at the end is thus the actual order of citation of each reference. If you need to cite an earlier reference, you do so by reference to its original citation number. An example would be: “In the seminal work by Andrews (1)…” The chief benefit of this system is that it makes the text much easier to read, since there are fewer interruptions in the flow of words. Its primary disadvantage is that if you need to add or delete a reference, you will then need to renumber your reference list and also change all the numbers in text to make sure they still match. It is for this reason that we often see people using reference managers such as EndNote or Reference Manager. I caution, though, that reference managers are only as good as the information you import. This system is also referred to as Vancouver style, after the so-called Vancouver Accords followed by many biomedical journals.
Both systems are seen in scientific publication, but Vancouver is more common. You should be familiar with both and carefully follow journal instructions related to references. They are certainly the most common source of problems for editors.
Monday, April 25, 2016
Monday, April 18, 2016
Monday, April 11, 2016
Editing a Quiz in Brightspace
From the Brightspace video library, I thought this might help some of you.
Monday, April 4, 2016
Palmer College Platform Presentations from ACC-RAC
Doctors of
chiropractic working in private sector medical facilities: a descriptive survey
Christine
Goertz, Stacie Salsbury, Elissa Twist, Virginia
Smith, Anthony Lisi
Building an
academy of educators: a needs assessment
of selected faculty educators
Michael
Tunning, Dustin Derby, Kelly Krell-Mares, Michelle Barber
Creating the
teaching track of a workshop for CAM educators in evidence-based clinical
practice
John
Stites, Amy Minkalis, Renee DeVries, Dana Lawrence, Cynthia Long
Creating an orientation
for a clinical teacher
Katherine
Clark, Ron Boesch, John Stites, Susan Larkin
Depressive symptoms in first year chiropractic students
Shawn He, Niu Zhang
Chiropractic and respiratory therapy: an essential professional
collaboration
Robert Rowell, Josefina
Torres
Multimorbidity,
musculoskeletal complaints, and pain characteristics of older adults with low
back pain: a secondary analysis from a randomized controlled trial
Stacie
Salsbury, William Alexander, James Boysen, Julie Harman, Janice Hubbard, Elissa
Twist, Robert Vining, Christine Goertz
Does requiring
students to justify answer changes during collaborative testing enhance
academic performance?
Niu
Zhang, Charles Henderson
Chiropractic
student attitudes toward team-based learning
William
Sherrier, Ali Rabatsky, Teresa Brennan
The effects of
standardized patient performance by chiropractic interns on their reported
empathy for their patients
Teresa
Brennan, James Randazzo, Ali Rabatsky
The effect of force feedback training on students learning Flexion
Distraction technique
Robert
Rowell, Ram Gudavalli, Steven Silverman
Dosage of
treatment for cervical pain by field doctors using cervical Flexion Distraction
Dana
Madigan, Jerrilyn Cambron, Jennifer Dexheimer, Maruti Ram Gudavalli, James Cox
Using best practices to engage adult millennial learners in
the large classroom
Lisa Killinger
Assessing the level of test anxiety in first trimester
chiropractic students
Judy Bhatti, Elissa
Twist, Katherine Manley-Buser
Outcome
measures in chronic migraine management - clinical use and potential cost
savings: a case study
Nathan
Hinkeldey, Kevin Percuoco, Laurie Hinrichs, Noelle Johnson, Michael
Tunning
Multi-modal
treatment of an 18 year-old collegiate soccer player with a grade 2 MCL tear
Todd
Riddle, Michael Tunning, Thomas Hyde, Dale Richardson
Survey of students’ perception of the Palmer preceptor program
Roger
Hynes, Alana Callender, Rachelle Hynes
Transient osteoporosis
of the hip - an uncommon differential variant in a chiropractic patient: a case
report
Stephen
Grand, Alivia Shoop
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)